Below is my paper for my Yale University Art Gallery visit. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did with the visit. Professor, I will be sending you a file copy in case you would like to review in Word for length, etc. I had to recreate all the photos and their positioning in Blogger because it does not allow for transition without uploading photos.
Yale University Art
Gallery Visit
Sean Rallis
I had
chosen to deviate from my anticipated schedule and pre-empt my first museum
visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Art with a trip to the Yale University Art
Gallery. This proved highly beneficial, as I was able to offset each week’s
visit with posting for the previous week’s visit. At the request of my wife, I
took her and our children with me on my visit (they will be my traveling
companions for every week except for the visit to the Met, to which my sister
took the train from Long Island to come visit). We made our way over to
downtown New Haven on November 3rd in the early afternoon.
Yale University Art Gallery Exierior |
For a weekend day, I didn’t find the museum as crowded as I
had anticipated. There were more people traveling the streets outside of the
museum than were found inside; mostly college-aged. Both times I have visited
the museum (once on a weekend and once in the middle of the week) I have found
this to be the case.
Yale University Art Gallery is the oldest university art
gallery in the Western hemisphere. It was originally built in 1853 after John
Trumbull (most noted for his Revolutionary War paintings) had donated a
collection to the college. This building was on the old campus grounds and was
demolished. The interesting thing that I saw while I was there (and I regret
not getting a photo) was that John Trumbull and his wife are buried on the
grounds below the first-floor antiquity gallery. The newer building was
constructed in two phases: the first phase was completed in 1928 by architect
Edgerton Swartwout. The second portion was completed in 1953 by Louis I. Khan.
Visitors will notice two distinct styles when wandering the interior as a
result of this. According to Yale’s website, Edgerton designed his portion as
an, “older “Tuscan Romanesque” section of
the gallery…distinguished by the neo-Gothic arched windows and Art Deco bridge
over High Street.” (buildings.yale.edu). The archways and stairwells
reminded me of Yale Peabody Museum.
I find
the museum quite easy to navigate. The elevators inside each have a map of the
building. There are three "towers" inside, each connected by a walkway across
the multiple floors. My first time that I visited the art gallery I was there
to focus on the European Art, specifically the Renaissance and early church
art. I was able to see more of the museum this time around, but not much more,
because there is only so much attention that toddlers can give to wandering a
museum before they hit a wall. We were able to revisit the European Art
section, which I was fully able to
wander this time around, and we took a trip over to the American paintings and
sculptures section.
I enjoy
the way that the European Art section has this sort of division to the
presentation. The portion of the gallery that contains much of the Byzantine,
Renaissance and early medieval art has a much more reverent atmosphere. There
is no natural lighting because this is a more interior-portioned gallery. As a
result, I think it enhances the viewing; it gives me the impression as I walk
among the portraits, icons and statues that I am not in an art gallery but
wandering the hallways of some old, historic church. Once you make your way
into the remainder of the European gallery, it becomes an art gallery in the
more traditional sense. There is more natural light filtering in as you make
your way past works by artists such as Monet, van Gogh and Peter Paul Rubens.
I found
American paintings and sculptures section to be a vastly different and less
intimate experience than the European gallery. Many of the works in this hall
are on a much larger scale, portraits that scale floor to ceiling, grand
landscapes that encompass entire walls, and the like. Just for frame of
reference, the below painting is almost 9 feet long by 4.5 feet tall, massive!
The hall itself sports very cavernous ceilings. I enjoyed the actual rooms as
well. The choice of colors, flooring, and wood trim and molding, along with the
paintings gave me a similar impression to that of the previous gallery in that
while viewing these paintings I felt like I was walking the halls of a historic
home.
Richard, Duke of
Gloucester, and the Lady Anne. Edwin Austin Abbey. 1896.Oil on canvas
|
Rather
than focus on one specific piece that caught my attention, I wanted to discuss
a specific subject that I found among three of the pieces. On my first visit to
the art gallery earlier this year, I was intrigued by a pair of paintings from
the early Italian Renaissance works that told a story from the life of Saint
Anthony the Great. I am not a religious person, and I am quite unfamiliar with
much of the legends and myths surrounding the lived of Catholic saints, but
I’ve always been fascinated with religious art. I love that so many people over
the course of history have taken to so many different interpretations of the
same stories in different styles. The first image shown is called The Temptation of Saint Anthony Abbot. This
work was painted by an individual known as Master of the Osservanza. The artist
is relatively anonymous, though it is speculated he was really Sano di Pietro,
another Sienese artist, whose contribution to the gallery I will discuss
briefly later. According to information taken from the J. Paul Getty Museum
website, “Scholars
named him for a triptych in a church just outside of Siena. The Church of the
Osservanza, which is Italian for observance…”(getty.edu) Siena was also
a very well-known region for the arts during the Renaissance.
The Temptation of Saint Anthony Abbot. Master of the Osservanza. 1435-1440. Tempera on panel |
Close up of the tempting devil |
Close up of Saint Anthony |
One
of the more interesting things I noticed about this painting was the strange
composition of the landscape. There really isn’t a level frame of reference in
the painting, but what I found strange was the curvature of the sky and the
distant landscape as opposed to the foreground where the subjects stand. It
comes off as a strange combination, almost as if I am viewing the painting
partially through an apartment door peep hole. My focus was also drawn to the
peculiar proportions of Saint Anthony. I can’t
help but notice how far down his knees appear to be in his frame, hand
outstretched in resistance.
The tempting devil in this painting
takes on a form of a woman to turn Saint Anthony aside from his resolute life
of religious, monastic solitude and return him to his former life. I am unsure
if I interpret her folded arms as a sign that she is not phased by his resistance
or if this her hands folded inward, a sign of her false innocence behind her
motives?
Further into
the European gallery, amongst the Dutch painters sits two paintings that
pertain to the same story. Each is unique in representation of the temptation.
The first painting is by Jan Brueghel the Elder, painted in 1594. This, too, is
entitled The Temptation of Saint Anthony.
The Temptation of Saint Anthony. Jan Brueghel the Elder. 1594. Oil on copper. |
Jan
Brueghel the Elder was born in 1568 in Brussels, Belgium. He was part of the
Flemish Renaissance movement. The Flemish Renaissance was brought about in
response to the Italian Renaissance and as we are told via Wikipedia, “Dutch and Flemish painters were also
instrumental in establishing new subjects such as landscape painting and genre painting.” (Dutch and Flemish Renaissance painting,
Wikipedia.org). Brueghel
was also well-known for his floral, landscape, and gallery paintings, but he
had also done a few allegorical and religious pieces, such as this. What I
noticed about this painting in contrast to the previous centuries’ work was the
expansion on this idea of temptation in the work. Brueghel includes this almost
allegorical representation of not just a carnal temptation, such as Osservanza
had represented. We can see many different creatures and characters surrounding
the Saint. I believe each one is something in the world that claws at him for
attention.
Close up of Brueghel's work. |
There
are three things I’d like to point out with this up-close photo that I took. It
is the only other photo that I took of the painting that came out adequate.
First, in the background we see a church with what appears to be light coming
from it. I’m not sure how I interpret this inclusion. On one hand, the overall
theme of the painting is temptation of the Saint, so I pondered whether this
was maybe the church was on fire, or in some other distress (are those birds or
more demons flying around the front spire?) that would try and pull the Saint
back into the world. It could also be a beacon of hope for the Saint amidst his
suffering. The second thing is that Saint Anthony’s attire is almost identical
to the previous painting. I am unsure if this would have been traditional
attire for monks in the early church, but that is a possibility. The third
thing that I noticed in the painting it just above the Saint we see this flying
demon with a scroll. This isn’t something what we noticed in the representation
of the devil in the previous painting, but I did see a near identical
representation in another work next to the Osservanza.
Saint Anthony Abbot
Tormented by Demons.
Sano di Pietro.1435-1440. Tempera on panel.
|
I have included this work for comparison, so I don’t plan on
getting into as much detail with it. This is Saint Anthony Abbot Tormented by Demons by Sano di Pietro,
1435-1440. You’ll notice that though there are two separate artists, the style
is identical, so you can understand why there is speculation that Osservanza and
di Pietro are the same artists. So as a fly-by description of what we are
seeing, at some point in his life, Saint Anthony retreats from cave dwelling to
living in a cemetery (because, why not?). It is here that he is beaten and tormented
by demons while waiting for his friend to bring him food.
Close up of di Pietro demon. |
The last Saint Anthony painting that I saw was possibly my favorite. Just to the right of Brueghel’s we have a work by David Teniers the Younger, another Flemish painter. The one on display in Yale is one of five different pieces Teniers did with the theme. This one was painted in 1650.
The Temptation of
Saint Anthony. David Teniers the Younger. 1650. Oil on copper.
|
Close up of Tenier's Saint Anthony |
Teniers continues in this piece on
display at Yale with the cave motif, though he explored other settings, such as
a ruined castle. In all the pieces, the central focus of Saint Anthony with the
two women have been the constant theme. I think this is what I like about this
painting out of all three. We saw resistance in Osservanza, we saw resolve in
Brueghel, but I think in Teniers, we see human. I feel like Saint Anthony is
struggling in this piece, distraction in front of him (notice that though it is
a woman, her clawed feet and demon tail give away her true nature) and
temptation behind him, with the horned old woman, most likely a representation
of the devil himself. In this piece, Saint Anthony is literally and
figuratively up against the wall.
Overall, I wish we had been able to
have a fuller visit to the gallery, but it becomes difficult with children in
tow. Still I believe we spent a good two hours in there between the two-three
sections we chose to focus on. It was nice to revisit the early Renaissance art
and see much of the Colonial and early American pieces that were on display. It
was exciting to stumble across the two Flemish pieces this time as I didn’t see
them last time because the time period was not a focus for me. There were other
pieces that we viewed that I chose not to include, Van Gogh’s Night CafĂ©, for example. Hopefully my
kids will remember visiting many of these places and when they are older and
can appreciate it more, they will want to go back.
Cited Works:
Jan Brueghel the Elder. (2018, September 25). Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Brueghel_the_Elder
Master of the Osservanza (Italian, active 2nd quarter of the
15th century) (Getty Museum). (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/artists/2923/master-of-the-osservanza-italian-active-2nd-quarter-of-the-15th-century/
Venerable and God-bearing Father Anthony the Great. (n.d.).
Retrieved from
https://oca.org/saints/lives/2015/01/17/100216-venerable-and-god-bearing-father-anthony-the-great
Yale University. (n.d.). Property Overview - Yale University
Art Gallery. Retrieved from
https://web.archive.org/web/20130830040549/http://www.buildings.yale.edu/property.aspx?id=26
Well done, Sean. I really like your sticking with the St. Anthony theme and examining stylistic details that were similar and different. That you were fascinated by the theme and early Renaissance art was impressive. Your keen observation and the photos you took supported your narrative nicely. Even though it was difficult to have your toddlers in tow, it was a good thing to do... to make a family outing out of the assignment...
ReplyDeleteYou are on the right track... Keep going!
There was much more that didn't make the cut. There are John Trumbull early drafts on display next to later finished works that I was intrigued by. I liked seeing how Trumbull started to work a piece and left most of it in sketch. I didn't know ahead of time that the gallery was well-known for housing The Night Cafe. I know scant about van Gogh past his more famous works; I didn't even know this was a popular piece. It was fascinating to see one of his works as close up as I was able to. I was amazed at how sloppy it looks with globs of paint just slapped together. I read a little bit about it last night and apparently he had reason for painting the thick texture it in the manner he did because to van Gogh he was conveying a message of the ugliness of the seedy cafe.
Delete